- He's a Republican (did I even need to say it?);
- He bases the proposal to allow parents to execute "rebellious" children on some passage from some version of the Christian Bible.
Should anyone who genuinely believes a parent should be able to arrange his/her own child's execution for "rebellious" behavior be allowed to hold public office of any sort?
We don't even need a law against such parental action (other than the murder laws already on the books). What we need is common sense on the part of voters no matter what their political affiliation, a tacit agreement that some things don't pass muster no matter which party's candidates advocate them.
Is such a silent rejection of the hardest of hardcore capital punishment too much to ask? Oh. Excuse me. I forgot that one is not permitted under any circumstances to request that a fundamentalist evangelical god-botherer exercise reason in the least degree. How silly of me. [/snark]
Indeed, Arkansas being what it is, Fuqua may well be elected.
No comments:
Post a Comment
USING THIS PAGE TO LEAVE A COMMENT
• Click here to view existing comments.
• Or enter your new rhyme or reason
in the new comment box here.
• Or click the first Reply link below an existing
comment or reply and type in the
new reply box provided.
• Scrolling manually up and down the page
is also OK.